In this Discussion
- Flanders September 2019
- GaryH August 2019
- GLAMOUR August 2019
- H-BOMBER August 2019
- jum August 2019
- LETSDOTHIS August 2019
- paraletic September 2019
- piker August 2019
- Ridersonthestorm33 September 2019
- Rodent September 2019
- thefalcon September 2019
- therealkramer August 2019
- TheSwooper August 2019
- udontknow August 2019
- Uttsy August 2019
Who's Online
0 Members & 135 Non Members
Belmont Preview for 31/8/19 by TMP (still)
West Australian Racing
piker
404 posts
I am still recovering from Wanna Be Good running 2nd last week; seemed to have the race won in the straight until..........
No go this week for WBG with poor draw and no WP!
R/1 The unusally spelled Indisisive reminds of that story of the 2 old boys talking; one of them was saying 'I was indecisive last year but thisyear I think I've improved; but I'm not really sure'. Any way we have such a greatly advanced trainer here. Also there is Jovella who may well be v improved after missing the start last time.
R/2 Here is where I have become serious. The barrier trial was v v impressive with Superstorm. I have taken 2.2 going with a double after WP saluted on the shortener fave of D Morton in the maiden today. I just do not think it is a great field and maybe that acceleration may have over the line first.
R/3 The toppie had lots of luck last time. Bel my Pago would need luck too on Sat. Excise Free has been painful for me previously.
So I will go for Citichant as the trainer can keep his horses racing consistantly and he does have the speed to suit the 1000m ; interesting jockey change too.
R/4 Maybe the change of jockey will suit Saracino; would like to see him bowling along in front from that draw. The fave seems a risk at this distance.
Dont Fuss seems a v good price.
R/5 Gatting is the class act here and the trial was v impressive. The right gear is back on.
R/6 I backed Why Choose Her when she failed 2 starts ago; then missed out when she won (a true mug punter). I am hoping she will not have wet track or the easy easy run she had last time. So I am on to Final Hearing; hoping he has improved alot after showing improvement from his promising early days.
R/7 Here is our raffle distance race; throw in the usual suspects and mix that with apprentices and I am pretty stumped.
R8/I backed Truly Gold last time as an outsider when Purist lobbed. Truly Gold has no wet track form; so on top of the ground I had better stick.
I looked at Marabel too pous Blue Horse ; then Sonnen is not hopeless. Also who can ignore Foc's opinion with Vermont Lady?
R/9 This is a good race with progressive types. I cannot understand the long price on Neurological; maybe he just runs well for WP.
Tamasa has a shocker of a draw. Chix Pick must go in on the better track.
In Love with Paris is a heartbreaker but will be in (again). Spillinova never seems to run great tines but does the job; should be ready for this one.
Good luck to all and hopefully Scales of Justice might put his best foot forward running on pace at Caulfield on Sat; I think he is one of those that needs an uninterrupted run (like me).
No go this week for WBG with poor draw and no WP!
R/1 The unusally spelled Indisisive reminds of that story of the 2 old boys talking; one of them was saying 'I was indecisive last year but thisyear I think I've improved; but I'm not really sure'. Any way we have such a greatly advanced trainer here. Also there is Jovella who may well be v improved after missing the start last time.
R/2 Here is where I have become serious. The barrier trial was v v impressive with Superstorm. I have taken 2.2 going with a double after WP saluted on the shortener fave of D Morton in the maiden today. I just do not think it is a great field and maybe that acceleration may have over the line first.
R/3 The toppie had lots of luck last time. Bel my Pago would need luck too on Sat. Excise Free has been painful for me previously.
So I will go for Citichant as the trainer can keep his horses racing consistantly and he does have the speed to suit the 1000m ; interesting jockey change too.
R/4 Maybe the change of jockey will suit Saracino; would like to see him bowling along in front from that draw. The fave seems a risk at this distance.
Dont Fuss seems a v good price.
R/5 Gatting is the class act here and the trial was v impressive. The right gear is back on.
R/6 I backed Why Choose Her when she failed 2 starts ago; then missed out when she won (a true mug punter). I am hoping she will not have wet track or the easy easy run she had last time. So I am on to Final Hearing; hoping he has improved alot after showing improvement from his promising early days.
R/7 Here is our raffle distance race; throw in the usual suspects and mix that with apprentices and I am pretty stumped.
R8/I backed Truly Gold last time as an outsider when Purist lobbed. Truly Gold has no wet track form; so on top of the ground I had better stick.
I looked at Marabel too pous Blue Horse ; then Sonnen is not hopeless. Also who can ignore Foc's opinion with Vermont Lady?
R/9 This is a good race with progressive types. I cannot understand the long price on Neurological; maybe he just runs well for WP.
Tamasa has a shocker of a draw. Chix Pick must go in on the better track.
In Love with Paris is a heartbreaker but will be in (again). Spillinova never seems to run great tines but does the job; should be ready for this one.
Good luck to all and hopefully Scales of Justice might put his best foot forward running on pace at Caulfield on Sat; I think he is one of those that needs an uninterrupted run (like me).
+1 -1
Ridersonthestorm33 likes this post.
Comments
The three fave's might go for it a little way out, and either Variation or Multiverse smothered away in the small field might run on into 1st or 2nd.
Very good was Idyllic Prince for Jim Taylor, strong fellow could come with a withering burst. Must have been around about 2005, 2006 was at his peak.
udontknow likes this post.
Will have something each way, mostly place on that one for nostalgia.
hash likes this post.
That rules out Truly Gold in the 8th.
I won't put in ChixPic or ILWP in the last (nor The Fugazi).
So I have to lean more to Spillinova.
Final Hearing does not exactly have wet form but I'll stick (but Why Choose Her seems a swimmer).
Superstorm has the right name and sire for a wet track. Did Mikimoto handle it? This fellow looks stronger than Miki, so we will know soon!
Classic Chant was I thought better off on a good track? I guess Bel my Pago comes in a bit now.
So please help with any suggestions; I need them!
He's raced in NSW and Victoria, interesting form line along the way - just the two starts in the wet and in the money in both - by Exceed And Excel - perhaps named after somebody who did exceed and excel, President John F Kennedy.
Yes against the odds on stageman.
Boom
My best each way in the last Sense of Power at 50s
I reckon there's a plan in place with Bunker Buster, a win would not suprise
Kalgoorlie ???????
Hope so, I'm going this year
$-)
Ridersonthestorm33 likes this post.
The amount of roughies Steve Parnham lobs first four seems to be a good number too.
Indian Chant in the first got back ran on OK but never likely, and the big drifter Kennedy in the third, gave up pretty meekly. Back to the drawing board would say for him.
And trys to pull that shit off lol
Bingo
hence my comment^^^
https://cris.rwwa.com.au/JwPlayer.aspx?jw=JnJlcGxheVVybD1odHRwOi8vbWVkaWFyd3dhLnNreXJhY2luZy5jb20uYXUvUmFjZV9SZXBsYXkvMjAxOC8wNS8yMDE4MDUxMFBJSlIwNl9WLm1wNCZ2ZW51ZT1QSU5KJnJhY2VEYXRlPTIwMTgtMDUtMTAmcmFjZU51bT02
thefalcon likes this post.