G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 322 Non Members

didn't the steward tick off the correct distance???

West Australian Racing
careycarey    6,424 posts
edited November -1 West Australian Racing
mr zucal told me several years ago that the stewards have a checklist that they have to follow to ensure everything is as it should be PRIOR TO THE RACE!!!.......

General:
Following the race Stewards identified that the time of this race was inconsistent with the advertised distance and instructed Club Officials to verify the actual distance of the race. It was subsequently ascertained that the distance was not run over 2000m and was in-fact 2242m, this error arose due to the rail being moved to 10m and the starting point not being adjusted.

.......so in this case i suppose the stewards in charge got his knuckles rapped NOT!!! :roll:
it's no where near good enough.
hello hello mr stewards, how about doing your job correctly.
you could maybe buy this shabbiness at a picnic venue, but at a meeting supposedly run by professionals, it's a joke,.... except it is not funny.
pathetic actually.

Comments

  • Agree Carey

    Good news for connections of Crispiano is that they now hold a track record that should never be broken
  • RodentRodent    7,470 posts
    Yes, pathetic. Also pathetic that the stewards report says the distance should have been 2000m :lol:
    Of course, it was meant to be 2200m.

    Interestingly, when Wizaway won a 57-68 over 2200m at Northam on 13/10/10 on a Good3 rail out 10m (same track rating and rail position as the Crispiano Maiden race) the winning time was 2:22.75.

    Now if a 2:21.79 maiden is inconsistent with the advertised distance, what is a 2:22.75 57-68? Maybe this mistake was made but not detected before?
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    Yes, pathetic. Also pathetic that the stewards report says the distance should have been 2000m :lol:
    Of course, it was meant to be 2200m.

    Interestingly, when Wizaway won a 57-68 over 2200m at Northam on 13/10/10 on a Good3 rail out 10m (same track rating and rail position as the Crispiano Maiden race) the winning time was 2:22.75.

    Now if a 2:21.79 maiden is inconsistent with the advertised distance, what is a 2:22.75 57-68? Maybe this mistake was made but not detected before?

    i just checked the video and that race started from the wrong position too rodent.
    i have suspected for a while that they are back to their old ways, but am too busy with other things.
    it's easier dealing with places that you know strive to be be better than the others, and take pride in what they do.
    i suppose that's what you get when you are a huge bureaucracy that appears to have care of self as it's only responsibility, and do not appear to be answerable to anybody or anything.
  • Crispiano and wizaway in the same race tomorrow too
  • lets_elopelets_elope    299 posts
    This is what I've been saying for years about the professionalism of RWWA and its Stewards or rather the lack thereof yet when I bring it up I'm attacked by all and sundry. Like I've said previously good luck assessing race times in your form analysis.
  • careycarey    6,424 posts
    said:

    This is what I've been saying for years about the professionalism of RWWA and its Stewards or rather the lack thereof yet when I bring it up I'm attacked by all and sundry. Like I've said previously good luck assessing race times in your form analysis.

    luck has nothing to do with it.
    if i was betting those races you can be sure i would already have known.
    maybe it's that lack of professionalism that drives people away from the wa product.

    you are ONLY attacked when you bring up nonsense that you won't or can't substantiate.
    you have an agenda which i suppose is fair enough, but you never ever give any detail to back it up.
  • lets_elopelets_elope    299 posts
    Check the paper in a couple of weeks times mate and you will discover surprise surprise that everything I've said was 100% spot on and all of the idiots on here will need to go and have a good look at themselves in the mirror and owe me and the person concerned a very big public apology.
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,486 posts
    Gis a cloo, l-e.. :P
  • slipatiptomeslipatiptome    3,351 posts
    Good to see Eloper back. Where have you been the past couple of months?
  • lets_elopelets_elope    299 posts
    Falcon you'll be the one needing a clue in a couple of weeks time when the truth is revealed in the paper the new CEO has been busy cleaning up RWWA ,O'Reilly's, Robertson's and Van Heemst's mess.
    You can take that to the bank.
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,486 posts
    I will await the revelation with interest, l-e.
    From what I am lead to believe is that this "revelation" has been a long time coming.
    Tell the CEO to keep his powder dry... :wink:
  • [DeletedUser][DeletedUser]    0 posts
    Just having alook at last wensdays meeting at belmont gee some of those times look a bit odd to me some are very slow then again it might be the horses invovled they look rather slow but just the same maybe carey can shed some light.
  • whitewashwhitewash    81 posts
    Thats as as bad as opening an enquiry then interviewing an apprentice without their Master, Parent or Guardian present :roll:
Sign In or Register to comment.