In this Discussion
- agro58 November 2010
- BlacksAFake November 2010
- Blake November 2010
- BobbyDavis November 2010
- Bookers November 2010
- carey November 2010
- Chris November 2010
- Coldy November 2010
- cubes November 2010
- Dark November 2010
- darkshines November 2010
- Dec November 2010
- Downbythepalms November 2010
- dungy November 2010
- Famous1 November 2010
- G-Mac November 2010
- GEN November 2010
- goose October 2010
- H-BOMBER November 2010
- HenleyBrook November 2010
- JakeHoward October 2010
- Jordan November 2010
- keymeup November 2010
- lets_elope October 2010
- littleboyblue November 2010
- LuckyLongshots November 2010
- Ngawyni November 2010
- Northerly November 2010
- pajones November 2010
- pluger November 2010
- Pratty November 2010
- RazorSharp November 2010
- rompz November 2010
- rot8in November 2010
- rustyh November 2010
- saintly November 2010
- Semipropunter November 2010
- Shanghai November 2010
- showtime November 2010
- slipatiptome November 2010
- sniper November 2010
- TheDiva November 2010
- thefalcon November 2010
- TheFunkster November 2010
- TheSwooper November 2010
- Tivers November 2010
- tony November 2010
- Vorgtraffic November 2010
Who's Online
0 Members & 135 Non Members
Comments
http://www.racingandsports.com.au/breeding/rsNewsArt.asp?NID=190468&id=FP
it kept same rating, it went from 97 to 96 after previous run, not this time.
it would not have surprised me though as there are many instances of that type of thing and worse happening.
but what about this for mind boggling stupidity.....m96/c0.
the ratings were brought in to simplify, but those dills in charge of handicapping in wa need to complicate it, by having two ratings.
if they had half a clue about handicapping this would not be needed in the first place.
mr hunter.....just rate the horses friggen correctly in the first place and you don''t need to resort to this stupidity.
the relative ability of horses is going to stay the same no matter where they bloody well race.
first you guys stuff it up completely by not properly differentiating between jurisdictions, and then instead of doing the smart thing and classing the races correctly, they decide to have two ratings to try and compensate for this.
surely, handicappers in wa don't get paid much do they????
something about you get what you pay for. :roll:
Plenty of plantations yet lots of space. :wink:
One almighty cast to get your line wet in the ocean from there.
Looking on the map though - Injidup (not Indijup) is on the coast yes.
Will pay that then. Salmon tackle instreat of trout then Jakester.
COLOUR CORRECT - looks on target
GOD HAS SPOKEN - top run, looks a leading Kingston Town/Perth Cup contender
INARTICULATE - excellent run
MEKONG MISS - 1600m looks too far
MORANT - needs some improvement
ELLIOTTO - outside chance if goes that way
CLUELESS ANGEL - needs improvement
MIGHTY ROSSA - should be racing in weaker
KENS DOUBLE - spell
MEGA STEEL - not good enough
ALMOHAD - Perth Cup
SIR HALLOWELL - gone, has problems
Wouldn't be using Saturday's race as your main / only form guide.
CC all day every day for mine against these and the Asian Beau runners. CC is a good chance to go for the bonus (does it still exist?), my mail is thats the plan to continue to the longer ones (Railway-KT-Cox).
Needs A Kennedy back on.
interesting no SET FOR FAME ??????
35 ALL SILENT 0 GRAHAME BEGG
36 ALLEZ WONDER 0 JAMES CUMMINGS
37 AVIENUS 0 MARK WEBB
38 BAWAARDI 0 DAVID HAYES
39 BLACK PIRANHA 0 CON KARAKATSANIS
40 CULMINATE(NZ) 0 DARREN WEIR
41 GATHERING 0 J THOMPSON
42 GOLD SALUTE B 0 MARK A RILEY
43 KING OF MOUNTAINS 0 DAVID HAYES
44 MELITO 0 GERALD RYAN
45 PALACIO DE CRISTAL 0 GRAHAME BEGG
46 SNIPER'S BULLET B 0 ROBERT SMERDON
47 TAGUS 0 J THOMPSON
48 TRIPLE HONOUR(NZ) 0 CHRIS WALLER
49 TRUSTING 0 J THOMPSON
50 VOILE ROUGE(NZ) 0 DAVID HAYES
51 WOOKAH 0 DAVID HAYES
52 ZAGREB 0 DAVID HAYES
Tell 'em they're dreamin !!! ;)
:lol: