In this Discussion
Who's Online
0 Members & 58 Non Members
Bunbury fantasy times 6/2/15
West Australian Racing
carey
6,424 posts
I can't believe they don't fess up that some of the times for this meeting are pure fantasy.
One look at them was enough to know they were nonsense.
As the distances were about right, then the only other thing that could be wrong is the actual times.
I had a standard deviation expected-actual of nearly 17 metres, which is impossible, unless something is drastically up that creek.
After checking.....
The 1410 race 2 was more like 86.21 not 84.24....almost 2 seconds of crapola.
The other 1410 race was more like 86.52 rather than the 85.72.
The others were not as bad but still ????
Yet not a mention from anybody that they are bullshit.
The idiotic thing about this, is that they upgraded the track after race 2(remember the time was nearly 2 seconds faster than actual!!!) =))
on risa it say timing is electronic!!!
may i humbly suggest that the 2 dollar clocks from the reject shop, are crap!!
One look at them was enough to know they were nonsense.
As the distances were about right, then the only other thing that could be wrong is the actual times.
I had a standard deviation expected-actual of nearly 17 metres, which is impossible, unless something is drastically up that creek.
After checking.....
The 1410 race 2 was more like 86.21 not 84.24....almost 2 seconds of crapola.
The other 1410 race was more like 86.52 rather than the 85.72.
The others were not as bad but still ????
Yet not a mention from anybody that they are bullshit.
The idiotic thing about this, is that they upgraded the track after race 2(remember the time was nearly 2 seconds faster than actual!!!) =))
on risa it say timing is electronic!!!
may i humbly suggest that the 2 dollar clocks from the reject shop, are crap!!
+1 -1
Thoroly_Bread likes this post.
Comments
1410 m
Leader - leader ?
it won't matter what the time was as far as that is concerned.
it will just be race time minus time to reach 600, and as such the wrong time will have no affect on that, because it will be wrong the same amount, thus giving the correct 600m.
cripes i hope you understood that, clarity is obviously not my strong point!! :-/
RIO likes this post.