Yep tonight showed we shouldn’t have discretionary stands when we have a handicapper that doesn’t understand form. Easter cup race for roses and trotters cup all been discretionary and have all had the best horses completely handicapped out of them
It seems the problem lies more in the balance than in the system itself—when the handicap doesn’t reflect the teams’ actual form, everything seems unfair. The idea of a clear formula like NR makes sense because it adds transparency. But it probably won’t be possible to eliminate subjectivity entirely—there will always be points of contention.
Yep tonight showed we shouldn’t have discretionary stands when we have a handicapper that doesn’t understand form. Easter cup race for roses and trotters cup all been discretionary and have all had the best horses completely handicapped out of them
Yep tonight showed we shouldn’t have discretionary stands when we have a handicapper that doesn’t understand form. Easter cup race for roses and trotters cup all been discretionary and have all had the best horses completely handicapped out of them
What handicap did it have in the nominations?
Hi AbbysAce,
Re- What handicap did it have in the nominations?
I try & save as many nominations as I can.
For this particular meeting, nominations closed at 8am Monday. I saved the HarnessWeb nominations at 5:30pm Monday.
Acceptances closed the next morning at 8:30am.
There were only ever 11 nominations & all accepted.
At the time of saving these nominations, all eleven horses had handicaps already allocated & visible for all to see. If any connections were unhappy with the allocated handicap they could have withdrawn without penalty up until close of acceptances at 8:30am the next morning.
I'm not saying one way or the other whether the allocated handicaps were relevant or fair, just that the allocated handicaps were known by all connections prior to acceptance.
Comments
Pinballwizard, Chopchop43 likes this post.
It seems the problem lies more in the balance than in the system itself—when the handicap doesn’t reflect the teams’ actual form, everything seems unfair. The idea of a clear formula like NR makes sense because it adds transparency. But it probably won’t be possible to eliminate subjectivity entirely—there will always be points of contention.
AbbysAce, Arapaho likes this post.
able to go into deal with what Stevie Wonder supposedly didnt see ?
well that doesnt narrow it down , I think we are all guilty at one stage or another of thinking our horses are a little better than they actually are
Arapaho likes this post.
Hi AbbysAce,
Re- What handicap did it have in the nominations?
I try & save as many nominations as I can.
For this particular meeting, nominations closed at
8am Monday. I saved the HarnessWeb nominations at 5:30pm Monday.
Acceptances closed the next morning at
8:30am.
There were only ever 11 nominations & all
accepted.
At the time of saving these nominations, all eleven
horses had handicaps already allocated & visible for all to see. If any
connections were unhappy with the allocated handicap they could have withdrawn
without penalty up until close of acceptances at 8:30am the next morning.
I'm not saying one way or the other whether the
allocated handicaps were relevant or fair, just that the allocated handicaps
were known by all connections prior to acceptance.
Arapaho, warrenrobinson likes this post.