In this Discussion
- buffy January 2017
- Chariotsonfire January 2017
- DamienWyer January 2017
- Dillinger January 2017
- Fastmoney January 2017
- geraltofrivea January 2017
- Gray January 2017
- H-BOMBER January 2017
- hash January 2017
- JayJay January 2017
- loose_goose February 2017
- luap January 2017
- Ngawyni January 2017
- oldhendo January 2017
- Paulo8 January 2017
- psycho January 2017
- Rodent January 2017
- silky January 2017
- SLIPPERGOLDEN January 2017
- sonny January 2017
- spinking January 2017
- squid69 January 2017
- TheDiva January 2017
- thefalcon February 2017
- TheSwooper January 2017
- tofarkennard February 2017
- tolleshunt January 2017
- tony January 2017
- TorpedoPunt January 2017
Who's Online
0 Members & 21 Non Members
Comments
Ridersonthestorm33 likes this post.
JayJay likes this post.
Their Thoroughbred and Greyhound form is done by analysts who view the races which then produces the computer generated form guide and prices based on the viewed analysis (overall form is reasonable).
All City and the majority of races on Sky are covered however races not on Sky are generally not analyzed.
Giddyup doesn`t do Harness form and the form and analysis is computer generated.
This may change in the future.
Not sure a lot of punters actually understand ratings based analysis and the prices that go with it.
Tabform (previously) and the majority of form guides produce a betting market hoping to be close to the tote or fixed prices, Giddyup produces a betting market that tries to predict "unders" and "overs" (similar to carey`s thoroughbred prices).
That difference and the Harness form being computer generated are the major issues.
geraltofrivea, hash likes this post.
Not even aware of any reputable Harness form that covers all of WA let alone all of Australia that could be relied on 52 weeks per year.
Agree with the criticism and they should have delayed the introduction until either Giddyup produced proper Harness form or they found someone who could.
Would have been obviously been cheaper for 1 company to provide all the form but if it is inadequate they should be called out.
Ridersonthestorm33, JayJay likes this post.
Finding an edge is extremely difficult. Perhaps the best way to use them is to assist one in eliminating, identifying or supporting your own thoughts.
I've roughly scribbled down their tips and prices for Ascot today so will see how they go.
psycho, hash likes this post.
Betting using ratings based analysis will only be successful with multiple bets in individual races and long term success will come from sustained betting over an extended period of time, provided the analysis is accurate.
Ridersonthestorm33, hash likes this post.
I don't use the TAB Form for doing handicapping any more, I made a decision long ago that I would do my own handicapping, from online. This decision came as I was sick of spunking money on the back of other peoples handicapping. If I was going to win or lose money it would be from my own homework. I will still take in thoughts and narration from some tipsters (sometimes from TABForm) but primarily it is from my analysis from CRIS and other online sources. My opinion is TAB Form has nowhere near enough data to carry out thorough handicapping Ie. generally a maximum of the previous 5 races are listed, which in my opinion is not enough.
I can understand that many people do rely on the TAB Form so they really need to fix this issue.
As for Giddy Up, I agree as most have said it is garbage. At the very least it is confusing. I do not trust this, or any similar service for the following reason, even if it is software that analyses the data and spits out its handicaps, the software parameters have to be set by a person/people, in which case it still makes it based on human opinion. If that makes sense.
Lastly, we've all seen (been?) the guy in the pub with the TAB Form open in front of him swearing and carrying on when a horse loses that a tipster has recommended. I choose not to be that person.
Using their longest priced runner/s can be treated as scratchings especially if your in the same thought that that particular horse doesn't have a winning hope
how did they go yesterday swoop??
I had another look at this one and the prices were the same for Race 7 as Race 8 in the West so I would assume that it is human error at the input stage.
Keepers Tale - Their price $1.90 Final odds $1.70 Top Fluc $1.85
Royal Star - Their price $1.80 Final Odds $1.10 Top Fluc$1.20
Amaliemoo - Their Price $2.20 Final Odds $1.80 Top Fluc $1.70
Pagan Dancer - Their price $3 Final Odds $2.90 Top Fluc $3.20
Du Plesis - Their Price $6 Final Odds $ $8.00 Top Fluc ? but place $3.20
Radient Girl - Their Price $3 Final Odds $3.10 Top Fluc ? but no doubt got on
Brothers Keeper - Their Price $4.20 Final Odds $5.30 Top Fluc ? but no doubt got on
Thunder Boom - Their Price $2.80 Final Odds $2.30 Top Fluc $2
5 winners picked on top but only one at the required price and so by rights - 4 bets for 1 winner @$3.20 although many would have got on Keepers as within 10% of asking price.
In Race5 - winner not selected in top 4.
In Race6 winner selected but rated $7 with top fluc of $4.60
In Race7 winner not selected in top 4
There were a number of horses that met the odds criteria so, if you were solely backing for a win, it would have been a losing day.
Gilgamesh likes this post.
Ngawyni, rustyh, oldhendo, spinking, thefalcon likes this post.
what else could he do, psycho...any adverse comment and he's at Centrelink.
that mob needs a bloody big broom from top to bottom...
X(psycho likes this post.
jum likes this post.
As of today - I've made the decision to no longer bypass the garage and to cease my purchase of the form paper as it no longer offers me what I want. Its time for me to truly embrace the digital world and so as I'm sipping on my coffee, I'll be flicking through the free PDF's supplied by the NZ TAB on my ipad.
So, with their decision to change the format and distribution of the TABForm, I'm also making a conscious decision to change the way I spend my $5.50. I'm thinking I'll need to allocate a small amount to printing costs as I do like having the main fields physically in front of me on a punt day and so I'm thinking $1.50 a week will go close to covering that . That leaves me $4 to spend. My goal is to put it in the piggy bank each week until their is enough to make a meaningful purchase eg every 5 weeks a nice bottle of Pepperjack shiraz wouldn't go astray. Whatever I do, I'll be making sure that it doesn't get spent at the TAB.
JayJay, oldhendo, Thunderstruck, SLIPPERGOLDEN, thefalcon, Ridersonthestorm33, squid69 likes this post.
JayJay likes this post.
VillageKid, cisco, Ridersonthestorm33, lame likes this post.