In this Discussion
- [DeletedUser] February 2013
- [DeletedUser] February 2013
- altern8vu February 2013
- Amyquil February 2013
- BlacksAFake February 2013
- brady February 2013
- Buddy February 2013
- Buddy23 February 2013
- Carlosa February 2013
- choc February 2013
- darkshines February 2013
- dungy February 2013
- Fastmoney February 2013
- goose February 2013
- hash February 2013
- Holly1 February 2013
- jonesee February 2013
- Jordan February 2013
- MorganJames February 2013
- Piston_Broke February 2013
- raconteur February 2013
- Radman February 2013
- RIO February 2013
- Rodent February 2013
- showtime February 2013
- SuburbanPunk February 2013
- SuperSnoop February 2013
- TheDiva February 2013
- thefalcon February 2013
- Thumper February 2013
- tolleshunt February 2013
- twiggy February 2013
- wedge February 2013
Who's Online
0 Members & 82 Non Members
Comments
I see your point, but just feel it would be good to get one or two looked into - betting plunges, maybe a successful one and a failed one - and see what they went after and why..maybe the stewards have and found there is nothing in it so that is why they dismiss information given to them so out of hand...the old..here we go again ..sort of attitude.
Don't know, but certainly appears to be a problem with some events and they don't appear to be given the time of day..
come on piston, how do $$s give brains.
maybe they have too much dosh but thats spent on flash cars, square mile tvs, blowsey chicks and designer clothes.
plus the occasional mac mansion.......how can money buy brains??
If you dont like it dont read it pretty simple really
so that rules out jocks
Melbourne and Sydney have already jumped to $85k for a Saturday race.
Lack of punting income because of small fields (which some think isn`t an issue) has got to the stage where an urgent fix is required.
Regardless of peoples thoughts on whether races are being manipulated, the perception is that some races in Perth are suspect.
If those in charge do nothing, then the obvious response is punters no longer bet or reduce their gambling on races in Perth.
Racing integrity and field sizes have become the key to maximizing turnover, if you don`t have either, a prosperous racing environment in the future is highly unlikely.
what racing needs in wa is a new chief steward. some one along the lines of murrihy, schrek or even zucal.
but where to get that person? thats the dilemma. and what to do with the present one.
When punters have an edge, either via speedmaps, algortithyms or the old weights and measure, until everyone else catches up, the cries of rort are common place. For all those sceptics, have alook at the feature 3yr old race at Caulfield on Sat. The same so called 'rorters' backed that of the map as well. Huge flucs in a feature 3yr old race melb, 5.50 to 3.90. a helluva lot more money is required for that, than some of these perth shorteners...but no doubt they got to snowden and mcevoy etc...As a well known commentator says...pleeeeaaaassseeee...
Remember whilst they win...and dont get me wrong they are very good, they back a lot of losers as well...
my tip, work harder and you may also have those with closed minds calling you a rorter as well....
Good luck on the punt to all.
ps, remember more than half the perth ring couldn't fram a 130% market without the help of the totes and the prepost betting from the corporates,.,and the corporate price setters are ex broke bookies or bookirs clersks..FACT!..go figure who is going to win!!!
Welcome Twiggy and bloody terrific first post.... Loved your ps as that is a huge problem with any decent punter trying to get on with corporates. The idiots who set most of the corporate prices have absolutely no idea and thus just ban anyone who seems to have an idea...
Do you agree that the most important thing right now to correct everyones impression on perth racing is for stewards to be at least a little more active in questioning pace in WA racing
Thankyou there is a god.
Now we have layers screaming rort when a fav wins and they lose.
As Twiggy said, the losers sulk.
throw your teacher overboard and listen to her scream
Belt off, trousers down. Isn't life a scream
I love nursery rhymes. Don't you Mummy
The wicked witch from the East hovers overhead
Alas, the golden unicorn sees no childish antics
What is everyone saying Mr Wolf
I have my favourites. They are wonderful little friends who do all the work.
The garden is always neat and tidy.
Take me back to the man who controls everything.
He will spread the gold to all the puppets
Don't tell anyone and no one will see.
Mummy, when I wake up can I watch the soccer.
I promise I won't talk to the naughty man
Vampi Lass went well.
We all know at least some trainers have punters. What if enough trainers had the same punter? Is this illegal? What if said punter had enough fingers in enough pies that he was getting riding instructions ahead of time as well as information on how each horse was expected to run? Lethal combination for sure. Personally, I have made decent money betting on WA gallops for over a decade with zero information. If I were privy to how a race would definitely be run as opposed to how based on form it was likely to be run, I could bet a lot bigger with a lot more confidence.
This is the crux of the matter. Punter confidence. Punters are increasingly suspicious that there are people out there with a patently unfair advantage. If an owner or trainer punts one of their own, good luck to them. What is clearly not acceptable is when there is collaboration in a race. Trainers may not be collaborating directly but there is the stench of a middleman, a puppeteer of sorts.
What other explanation could there be for races panning out to suit the punted horse each and every time? Please don't give me the speed map crap. Who would have had Times Are Changing going back in Texan's race?
Aside from the obvious spelling mistakes it caused, the red wine consumed yesterday may have made my comments re price assessors seem a little caustic. That wasn't meant to be the case. I was just highlighting that the tab's literally set 100's of fixed odds markets a week (which is an incredibly difficult task) and those markets then set the basis for where the betting starts and betfair dictates where the markets finish.
Rodent, you make some valid points and I don't for one minute believe that Perth racing is completely clean (it never has and likely never will) and agree for the industry to prosper confidence is paramaount. I also believe stewards across the country, not just WA, need to be doing more i.e. at least asking more questions. I think the lack of investigations etc boils down to steward panels being underesourced given the plethora of meetings that are now run across Australia every day of the week.
My point is whilst there maybe a smelly race here or there to be investigated, I think the paranoia about Perth racing being fixed on a weekly basis lacks substance and the more it is hyped the more shadows people seem to want to jump at.