G'day Punter!

Sign In Register

In this Discussion

Who's Online

1 Members & 335 Non Members
RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
edited November -1 West Australian Racing
Have heard some news that a jockey (a) was asked to produce a swab recently, another rider (b) obliged and gave him the sample, budabing budabing, they got caught and now the sample given by (b) has proved positive :shock:

So now a leading apprentice is in a whole heap of manure :wink:
+1 -1

Comments

  • dungydungy    9,278 posts
    RS when will this come out ??? if its proven to be correct
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    swabbing procedures are very strict - not sure jockeys would be able to swap swabs

    good story tho
    +1 -1
  • charleecharlee    20 posts
    said:

    swabbing procedures are very strict - not sure jockeys would be able to swap swabs

    good story tho

    Strict?? :lol: Pfffft!!!!
    +1 -1
  • BrubakerBrubaker    219 posts
    said:

    said:

    swabbing procedures are very strict - not sure jockeys would be able to swap swabs

    good story tho

    Strict?? :lol: Pfffft!!!!
    Remember a story a few years back. Jock gives sample. Gets report. Two lots of good news. Firstly, your swab is clean and secondly, congratulations.... you're pregnant. (Apparently got the missus to give a sample which he took to the races!) lol!
    +1 -1
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,483 posts
    Razor...come clean ARE you Piston's apprentice?? :lol:
    +1 -1
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    Nope, I think he pinches some of my mail though :evil:
    +1 -1
  • DarrahDarrah    2,933 posts
    said:

    swabbing procedures are very strict - not sure jockeys would be able to swap swabs

    good story tho

    "Good story" that happens to have foundation. News out now.
    +1 -1
  • slipatiptomeslipatiptome    3,351 posts
    Razor was certainly Sharp with that scoop.
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    said:

    said:

    swabbing procedures are very strict - not sure jockeys would be able to swap swabs

    good story tho

    "Good story" that happens to have foundation. News out now.
    where is it "out"? link?

    if Jockeys were able to swap samples then the testing procedures weren't being done properly

    samples are supposed to be pyschically observed by testers
    +1 -1
  • DarrahDarrah    2,933 posts
    Sounds like your doubting me ..........

    http://www.grassrootsracingwa.com/
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    no I wasnt - was just interested to read - normally you would post a link

    been several cases of this in the past over east - thought everything was tight now but obviously not over here going on that report
    +1 -1
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    last Oct, wonder why they been sitting on this for so long?

    What's the penalty?

    3 months my way of thinking :roll:
    +1 -1
  • ShatterStarShatterStar    52 posts
    I'd be thinking upwards of 6 due to the circumstances
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    atleast 2 years "if" guilty
    +1 -1
  • ShatterStarShatterStar    52 posts
    Yeah maybe, but you never know with this organization ... I'm off to bali to buy some phones......
    +1 -1
  • Unknown
    said:

    Yeah maybe, but you never know with this organization ... I'm off to bali to buy some phones......

    STOP TAKING THE PISS :P :P :roll:
    +1 -1
  • VoodooVoodoo    1,370 posts
    What's happend to the "Ryan Affair".....seems to have gone very quiet.

    cheers
    +1 -1
  • BobbyDavisBobbyDavis    916 posts
    said:

    swabbing procedures are very strict - not sure jockeys would be able to swap swabs

    good story tho

    Couldn't be further from the truth Della. Has been going on for years.

    Thee would be a few more in the sin bin if the testing was done how it should be.
    +1 -1
Sign In or Register to comment.