G'day Punter!

In this Discussion

Who's Online

0 Members & 64 Non Members

Comments

  • said:
    no mention of owners in there - trainers are the ones with the responsibility of handling the horses
  • Have been told

    "when trainers pay their licences part of the fee is for public liablity through the ata as not easy to get cover through normal insurance companies"

    I suspect if the owner was sued by a 3rd party they could counter sue the trainer
  • woodywoody    47 posts
    Not concerning racehorses in training, no - but I do know of a case a while back in Toodyay I think it was, where the animal got out of its agistment, and caused a car to crash,-and the horse's owner was held liable. Even if a trespasser on your property gets kicked by a horse, you are liable, so I'm told....It may be different if a horse is in a stable for training.
  • SemipropunterSemipropunter    438 posts
    said:

    said:
    no mention of owners in there - trainers are the ones with the responsibility of handling the horses
    I would have thought a stablehand walking more than one horse at a time would be an OH&S issue? Can't blame the owners for that. It's the responsibility of the trainer/foreperson, surely?
  • ShatterStarShatterStar    52 posts
    On having a look at racing Victoria's website it seems
    they have there shit sorted in relation to walking two horses
    at once ?? why hasn't this been sorted by Rwwa- Worksafe W.A ??



    WORKSAFE VICTORIA / HORSE STABLES AND TRACK RIDING SAFETY

    UNACCEPTABLE WORK PRACTICE

    - Leading a horse with a headstall and bit that is not
    attached to a lead.
    - Riding a horse bare back.
    - Open foot wear worn when working with or around horses.
    - Leading more than one horse at any time on foot.
  • thefalconthefalcon    20,471 posts
    Ho Hum.....good old WA.....
  • LuckyLongshotsLuckyLongshots    4,270 posts
    Ascot becoming a gated community would be the only way to stop what happened the other day.

    Out of interest where did the horse get loose from initially?

    Presume horses have got loose before being led or ridden by themselves. Although leading two horses at once is just asking for trouble, no matter how good a horseperson you are.
  • luckypunterluckypunter    35 posts
    heard loose horses again this time at caulfield
  • was looking thru the rules of racing and found this one

    AR.80D. A trainer must ensure that every horse in his care that is being led or ridden outside his stable premises on a public roadway or thoroughfare prior to sunrise wears a rug or other gear with reflective strips and that its rider or attendant wears a reflective vest of a design approved by the Stewards. Any person breaching this rule or found responsible for a breach of this rule may be penalised.


    I wonder how often that gets broken?
  • vaughanvaughan    11 posts
    I think the reasonable thing is 1 person 1 horse,some of the young ones are flighty,and doesnt take much to spook them, there is just to many idiots driving along Mathieson Rd,they dont care a toss.
  • HotJulesHotJules    229 posts
    What's the problem with walking two horses? Used to be a great way to warm up on a cold morning. I agree they are quieter.
  • ReinsReins    27 posts
    You are only asking for trouble leading two horses,especially with 2 year olds and other young ones that haven't been led before to and from the track or to the pool are going to be flighty and will get spooked easily,Even walking a young horse with a older horse so it is quiet is still stupid :!:
    one horse one person. I think some common sense needs to prevail in people.walking 2 horses one person should be a big 'NO NO"
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    If any of you clowns that are against leading 2 horses gave it a try you would see horses walk better with a partner, having said that when riding 1 and leading 1 is a recipe for disaster, the fact it was a horse breaker that the horses got away from shows that.
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    Speed humps on Mathieson Rd is a great idea. and also up and down the side streets, will make a difference but so long as you have horses racing horses will get away whether it being 1 horse led or 2 horses
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    said:

    was looking thru the rules of racing and found this one

    AR.80D. A trainer must ensure that every horse in his care that is being led or ridden outside his stable premises on a public roadway or thoroughfare prior to sunrise wears a rug or other gear with reflective strips and that its rider or attendant wears a reflective vest of a design approved by the Stewards. Any person breaching this rule or found responsible for a breach of this rule may be penalised.


    I wonder how often that gets broken?[/quote

    Have not seen many rugs with reflective gear, but very rare to see anyone without a reflective vest, so in answer to your wonderings Della, not very often to the 2nd part, and get out of bed to find out the other :wink:

  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    said:

    Not supposed to be leading two at a time now anyway.

    Boolchit, you dream that rule ?
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    Think you will find if they got away from Turf Club property the Turf Club can be held responsible, also something if the trainer is a member of the ATA, there is some kind of insurance there I am led to believe, GEN would know more about that. But lets face it the Trainers Asscociation are as soft as Fairy Floss
  • VoodooVoodoo    1,361 posts
    said:

    If any of you clowns that are against leading 2 horses gave it a try you would see horses walk better with a partner, having said that when riding 1 and leading 1 is a recipe for disaster, the fact it was a horse breaker that the horses got away from shows that.

    Actually Razor I have given it a try.....and yes the horses behaved and I had no problems.
    However the guy leading two in front of me was almost stretched into "gogo gadget' and was not so lucky.......needless to say I haven't lead two horses to the track since.
    Trying to save time cost owners of the escaped horse another 6 months and countless vet bills.
    And sir I am no clown......

    cheers
  • HotJulesHotJules    229 posts
    said:

    However the guy leading two in front of me was almost stretched into "gogo gadget' and was not so lucky.......

    Nothing to do with luck he just wasn't holding the leads properly. I have never had a problem. In fact the ones who walk on their lonesome are more likely to play up from my experience.
  • VoodooVoodoo    1,361 posts
    said:

    said:

    However the guy leading two in front of me was almost stretched into "gogo gadget' and was not so lucky.......

    Nothing to do with luck he just wasn't holding the leads properly. I have never had a problem. In fact the ones who walk on their lonesome are more likely to play up from my experience.
    Congratulations.....you haven't had a problem.I'm sure your owners will be appreciative of that...until of coarse..you do end up having a horse pull back,escape and get injured.
    Good luck to you though....hopefully it never happens.

    cheers
  • GENGEN    174 posts
    BREEDING AND TRAINING BOARD has some rules for you all :thumbup:
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    edited December 2010
    WORKSAFE WESTERN AUSTRALIA (2009)

    UNACCEPTABLE WORK PRACTICE RISK CONTROL SOLUTIONS

    Handling horses
    - Leading a horse with a headstall and bit that is not
    attached to a lead.
    - Riding a horse bare back.
    - Open foot wear worn when working with or around horses.
    - Inexperienced handlers; leadingmore than one horse at a time. - While being led, every horse must have a headstall and
    bit in its mouth, with the bit attached to a lead. Who is to give the call if someone i inexperienced?
    - While being ridden, every horse must be properly bridled
    and saddled.
    - All those working with or around horses must wear fully
    enclosed, durable footwear
    - Ensure a safe distance is maintained from other horses
    while riding (track work) or when leading a horse.


    ROAD TRAFFIC RULES (1974) da coppers


    Under the Road Traffic Act 1974, the definition of a "vehicle" includes, where the context permits, an animal being driven or ridden. As such, a ridden/driven horse has a legal right to use the road system, in accordance with the regulations governing vehicles. This means that horse riders/drivers must obey the road rules (stop, give way, keep left, signal etc).

    In addition, there are specific regulations under the WA Road Traffic Code 2000 relating to people in charge of animals. These include :

    Reg 267 Leading Animals

    (1) A person riding an animal shall not lead more than one other animal ($50 fine)
    (2) A person shall not lead an animal, while riding in a motor vehicle, or more than 2 animals while riding in any other vehicle that is not an animal ($50 fine)
    (3) A person shall not drive a vehicle (that is not an animal) if an animal tethered to that vehicle is walking or running behind or alongside the vehicle while it is moving ($100 fine and 3 demerit points for the vehicle driver)

    In essence this regulation means :
    - you cannot lead more than one other horse if you are riding/driving a horse in harness
    - you cannot lead a horse from a motor vehicle
    - you can lead up to 2 horses from a non-motorised vehicle which is not an animal (ie a push bike)
    - you cannot tie the horse to any sort of vehicle while it is moving.

    Reg 268 Rider of an animal on a footpath or nature strip to give way to pedestrians

    Riders of an animal are allowed to ride on paths and nature strips (unless otherwise signed) and drivers are required to give way to them (eg postie motorbikes). The rider of an animal must, however, give way to any pedestrian on a footpath or nature strip ($50 fine).

    Reg 269 Riding an animal alongside more than one other rider

    (1) The rider of an animal shall not ride on a carriageway that is not a multi-lane carriageway alongside more than one other rider, unless the rider is overtaking the other riders or droving stock. ($50 fine)
    (2) The rider of an animal shall not ride in a marked lane alongside more than one other rider in a marked lane, unless the rider is overtaking the other riders or droving stock ($50 fine).
    (3) If the rider of an animal is riding on a carriageway that is not a multi-lane carriageway alongside another rider, or in a marked lane alongside another rider in a marked lane, the rider shall not ride more than 1.5 metres from the other rider ($50 fine).

    This regulation basically means that :
    - you can't ride more than two abreast on any road that is not a multi-lane road (ie two or more lanes in each direction)
    - you can't ride more than two abreast in any marked lane
    - and if you are riding two abreast, then you have to be no more than 1.5 m apart

    Reg 270 Proper Control of Animals

    A person shall not on any road or place to which the public is permitted, whether on payment of fee or otherwise, to have access -
    (a) drive or ride an animal under the influence of alcohol, drugs or alcohol and drugs to such an extent as to be incapable of haivng proper control of the animal;
    (b) drive or ride an animal recklessly or without due care and attention.
    (100 fine).

    This regulation means you have to ride/drive in a responsible manner on the road as well as areas where the public has access (eg parks).

    These are the specific rules which apply to horse riders and drivers of horses in harness. Additionally, Regulation 129 (Driving on or across a continuous white edge line) allows riders or drivers of an animal to cross over a continuous white edge line on the carriageway. This allows horses to travel on the shoulder of the road, rather than on the carriageway itself. It may also be relevant to point out that, as vehicles, horses are expected to travel in the same direction as the traffic if there is no footpath or nature strip. This is in contract to pedestrians, who are obliged, if practicable, to travel on the carriageway in the opposite direction to the traffic (facing the oncoming cars) if there is no path available.

    There are also some places that horses can?t go eg Freeways and places with signs such as Roe/Tonkin Hway verges and on paths where the Council has erected No Horses signs.


    STATE LAW (2010) da state

    Horses being ridden are considered ?Vehicles?
    Under traffic laws horses ridden or driven (in harness) on roads, nature strips, paths and footpaths
    are treated the same as vehicles. They have the same rights and responsibilities as other vehicles,
    including motor vehicles, bicycles and power assisted pedal cycles.
    The following key rules are relevant:
     Riders are required to obey all the road rules that apply to drivers of motor vehicles,
    including signs such as those below.

     Riding a horse on or alongside any road (other than freeways) is permitted unless a sign, says otherwise.
     There are a few areas that ridden/driven horses can go that motor vehicles are not
    permitted. These include on paths and nature strips, unless otherwise signed.
     Horses can be ridden on the shoulder of a road, or to the left of any continuous edgeline, in
    the same direction of traffic.
     Riders on or crossing nature strips and paths must give way to pedestrians.
     Horses can be ridden across roads but must give way to all traffic on the road.
     Horses must not be ridden across a road on a ?pedestrian crossing? or ?children?s crossing? ?
    the rider must dismount and walk the horse across.
     Horses must not be ridden alongside more than one other horse on a road (or shoulder).
     Riders must give hand signals when changing direction.
    Riding at night
     Riding at night can be dangerous. Horses and riders are not required by law to have lights
    displayed and are therefore not easily seen. While riding on or next to roads at night should
    be avoided ? riders who do should ensure a reflective vest is worn and horses have reflective
    bands attached (such as reflective leg bandages)
  • RazorSharpRazorSharp    439 posts
    An accident waiting to happen is young kids being at trackwork, I dont care how supervised the parents think they are, they just should not be there.
  • ivanbigginivanbiggin    100 posts
    said:

    An accident waiting to happen is young kids being at trackwork, I dont care how supervised the parents think they are, they just should not be there.

    Care to elaborate on this Razor ?
  • SemipropunterSemipropunter    438 posts
    The last time I was at Eagle farm(a couple of yrs ago), I was looking at some horses at the race day stalls when a stable hand walked a horse past me, passing less than 30cm from me. There is a metal rail seperating the stalls and the general public and I was leaning against this at the time. Now I'm quick on my feet, but if this horse had reacted to anything and verred into me I'd of been crushed to death for sure. I was just staggered by the utter stupidity of it all. I remember around this time seeing the barrier attendants loading horses without vests. They seemed to have no regard for personal safety. I hope to god things have changed...
  • LuckyLongshotsLuckyLongshots    4,270 posts
    said:

    The last time I was at Eagle farm(a couple of yrs ago), I was looking at some horses at the race day stalls when a stable hand walked a horse past me, passing less than 30cm from me. There is a metal rail seperating the stalls and the general public and I was leaning against this at the time.

    Saw this occur at Belmont once, a horse being led and was veering out towards a rail where people were standing against. Person leading took no care, and didn't even know when the horse kicked out with two feet and very nearly took off someone's head. Most people in the horse industry are very safety conscience, even more so in public - some however need a severe uppercut!
  • If the hose is running backwards or moving backwards there is not alot anyone can do, it's up to the public to watch out for themselves, harder you pull on their mouth the harder they pull against you, you cant run around and give them a kick in the tummy, or even slap them on the neck, which is total bullshit IMO, at Belmont you have some blonde tart who runs and puts strappers into the stewards for the most trivial things
  • SemipropunterSemipropunter    438 posts
    said:

    said:

    The last time I was at Eagle farm(a couple of yrs ago), I was looking at some horses at the race day stalls when a stable hand walked a horse past me, passing less than 30cm from me. There is a metal rail seperating the stalls and the general public and I was leaning against this at the time.

    Saw this occur at Belmont once, a horse being led and was veering out towards a rail where people were standing against. Person leading took no care, and didn't even know when the horse kicked out with two feet and very nearly took off someone's head. Most people in the horse industry are very safety conscience, even more so in public - some however need a severe uppercut!
    There was a trainer killed at Rosehill not so long ago when crushed by his horse in the race day stalls.

    http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sport/veteran-trainer-pat-quinn-killed-in-horse-accident/story-e6frg7mf-1225760743911

    My beef is not about horse being so close, it's more the face that there is a metal rail with no give in it. Maybe they should install the plastic running rails in therse areas.
Sign In or Register to comment.